A New Paradigm Shift in Wealth Production

Amassing and creating wealth is more than just a requirement. For centuries, the practice of climbing the ladder to richness has caused wars, affected literature, and shaped cultures. Whether wealth can be found in the kind of money or food, all civilizations have pursued it.

The system of wealth production is based upon the present worldview, which in turn is based on the way science is studied and perceived. Most people will not be aware of existing paradigms of wealth production. They will be too hectic building up and developing wealth instead of being concerned with the procedure which they and their wealth underwent.

Existing paradigms in wealth development drive economies, and any shortcomings in existing paradigms can lead to modifications being made in the wealth development background. A new science can stimulate the interest of people and shift financial investments in various instructions. A shift in interest and investments can produce new worldviews. With brand-new science and worldviews, a new system of wealth development can be developed. This paradigm shift can be sustained for as long as the system is relevant. Again, drawbacks will be found, and again, modifications will be made. The procedure goes on.

Primitive human beings were nomadic. They moved around and lived from day to day, conserving little for shops and surviving on what food they could stumble upon. As soon as they calmed down, and as quickly as farming became a way of living, people found out to keep arrangements. Keeping provisions implied keeping wealth. Holding wealth provided human beings the chance to hold sway over those who held much less wealth. The space between those who had between those who had none grew and broadened.

At this moment, localized wealth development was widespread, and no place is this more obvious than in the Medieval Age. Abundant landowners employed bad farmers to work as fiefs or servants. Wealth was generated by force. Payment came just if a harvest achieved success, and if the fruits of the harvest could be sold. Just a couple of people had wealth, and they were not extremely charitable to begin with.

As human skills extended beyond agriculture, the Industrial Age began, and centralized wealth production became the paradigm. Slaves became staff members who were compensated with incomes and salaries. As payments were standardized, so were business. Monopolies was plentiful, and competitors was low.
Science, nevertheless, was on the upswing, and as more and more people were educated in science, increasingly more people began to understand industry and its workings. Slowly, competition increased, monopolies were broken, and tasks as soon as offered to a couple of individuals might currently be held by numerous.
With the spread and abundance of markets came advances in science– and with these advances came discoveries that created more jobs. With the Internet came web designers, graphic artists, and database developers.
With the rise of the details age came mass privatization. The wealth creation paradigm included neighborhoods without limits, where everyone could concentrate on whatever. A researcher might be a reporter however concentrate on nuclear physics. An academician could be an economic expert consulting with the government on the feasibility of introducing new agricultural crops. As the World Wide Web crossed slowly through the world, professions crossed paths with each other and combined.

If the Medieval age brought power to the hands of the land-wealthy, and if the Industrial age bowed to those who were industry-wealthy, the Modern age shifts wealth to those who have brains. The world’s most affluent male is Bill Gates, a nerd who is still laughing all the way to the bank.
The mass privatization of the contemporary age has actually seen companies assisting each other move on. If a food business wants progress, it should seek advice from scientists to perform safety tests on its products, nutritionists to announce its products as remarkable, advertising agencies to market its product, and total eBusiness services to move the mortar-and-brick workplace to the Internet.
The paradigm is all about teamwork– to develop wealth, everybody must help each other be successful. No longer are the lesser indebted to make the greater richer. Everybody needs to run the race, but everyone needs to hold hands to reach the goal together.
Some researchers have called this the age of free intraprise, the age of mass decentralization of wealth development. They can make wealth and receive it in various ways.
With the Internet bringing individuals together, the world has actually turned into one large household. The possible to create and amass wealth is no longer with one person– it is offered to numerous, and yet these lots of components working apart need to still collaborate in order to be successful individually.
For the moment, with knowledge easily offered, and with intelligence valued, the present paradigm seems ideal. The length of time it will last, and what will take place next, however, is still beyond the predictive powers of today’s brain-driven society.

Most people will not be conscious of existing paradigms of wealth creation. They will be too busy collecting and creating wealth rather than being concerned with the process which they and their wealth underwent.
Existing paradigms in wealth production drive economies, and any imperfections in existing paradigms can lead to modifications being made in the wealth creation background. Holding wealth gave people the opportunity to hold sway over those who held much less wealth. As human skills stretched beyond farming, the Industrial Age started, and centralized wealth development ended up being the paradigm.

Best of luck in your wealth creation,

Fredimann